Is it that the leaders of Europe don't listen or don't care? Or are they consumed by self-induced, self-destructive guilt? How will they atone for the sins of their colonial past?
Why, let into Europe the savages that for some decades they were able to keep under reasonable civilizational control as they robbed them of their natural resources. Let them come in and enjoy the benefits of what we have created at home with the wealth we stole from them. They will come in, enjoy and become happy campers like the rest of us.
That illusion was being proved wrong many years ago by actual experiences, long before 9/11/2001, but none are so deaf as those who will not hear and so blind they will not see. Even after 9/11 eyes and ears were shut.
Left-wing European elites are leaders in punishing their citizens for their many colonial and other sins by allowing, nay, encouraging the current Muslim invasion without noting their thuggery, superior contemptuous attitudes, violent behavior and lack of, shall we say, civilizational niceties (Toilet paper? What for?).
Garbage thrown out the windows into the courtyard of free housing provided to Muslim immigrants.
In the multicultural society, all civilizations are equal and the diversity is to be honored. Require assimilation? How insulting.
The British have had Muslim problems since it began allowing the immigration of Pakistani Muslims after the break-up of British India. Pakistani Muslims as well as Indian Hindus and Muslims were granted preferred status to immigrate to Britain. Hindus have largely assimilated and succeeded, the Muslims, hardly at all.
Warnings have been issued for years, before and after 9/11/2001.
What is not acknowledged is that Islam is at war with the rest of the world. It has been since its founding by Mohammad in 622, who declared unending war until Islam ruled the world.
To accomplish his initial goal of conquering Arabia presumably to root out paganism and to install belief in one god, Mohammad built an army. To provide resources for and to incentivise his army, he turned morality on its head.
He adopted the principle that the end of conquest justified the means, any means. Mohammad decreed that raiding caravans, attacking and seizing the wealth of peaceful communities and individuals, lying, deceit, stealing and killing those who would not acknowledge him as a messenger of God were good, not evil.
Not only that, his troops could keep 80% of the seized wealth and newly acquired human beings as slaves for sex, work or trade, as long as he got his 20% and his pick of the females. All for Allah. And a fighter who died advancing Mohammad's goal would be rewarded with an instant trip to a paradise with endless sex.
Mohammad's organizational genius and persuasive powers (it's amazing the things he got Allah to approve) unleashed the worst basic instincts of the animal world in his pursuit of power and wealth.
For 1400 years Mohammad's plan has been followed. First, believe. Second, submit, don't ask questions, just follow the program, I assure you, Allah has approved everything. Oh, if you ask questions, express doubt or leave the organization (Islam), you're a dead man. Any good Muslim can kill you in the service of Allah. This week's news proves Mohammad's words live on. In Bangladesh a publisher of atheist blogs was hacked to death.
Part of Mohammad's plan was to spread Islam by emigration. Muslims could leave their lands for lands of the infidels if their secret intentions were to expand the reach of Islam - hijra. Muslims could pretend to fit in, to be friends with infidels, but they should remain separate and maintain their ways, Sharia, and build communal strength until they would become strong enough to begin assuming control and transforming the host society to Islam.
Islamic leaders devised a plan for Europe back in the 1970s and even published it in book form in 1980.
The following article is a history lesson. It is a report published in the London Telegraph, a leading British newspaper, in 2005, ten years ago. Muslims expressed their outrage to the newspaper, which dutifully removed the offending article from its website, as a dhimmi would.
In the Muslim world a dhimmi is one who is not a follower of Mohammad, who acknowledges his inferiority and accepts his lower class position through deference and being humiliated -- and often paying a price to avoid being killed.
THE ISLAMIZATION OF EUROPE
- Dr Patrick Sookhdeo
Telegraph, London August 11, 2005
Dr Patrick Sookhdeo is Director of the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity.
On Friday 20th May 2005 a crowd of some 300 Muslims burned a wooden cross outside the American embassy in London. This was part of a protest against the rumoured desecration of a Qur'an by American soldiers in Guantanamo Bay, during which British and American flags were also burned. Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of this event was that it was not deemed to be newsworthy, receiving little attention in the national press.
The whole scenario is reminiscent of what happens in so many Muslim-majority countries: a rumour of an insult to Islam, a violent and blasphemous anti-Christian reaction, police watching idly, and a complete lack of public interest let alone outrage. It could have been Pakistan, Egypt, Indonesia or Northern Nigeria. But it was the UK.