UNDERSTANDING THE ISLAMIST MENACE


Sometime ago the Canadian-born writer Mark Steyn, who now lives in New Hampshire, wrote this paragraph which encapsulates the entire problem with how blind Americans are to what is in reality an existential threat:

I found myself behind a car in Vermont, in the US, the other day; it had a one-word bumper sticker with the injunction "COEXIST". It's one of those sentiments beloved of Western progressives, one designed principally to flatter their sense of moral superiority. The C was the Islamic crescent, the O was the hippie peace sign, the X was the Star of David and the T was the Christian cross. Very nice, hard to argue with.

But the reality is, it's the first of those symbols that has a problem with coexistence. Take the crescent out of the equation and you wouldn't need a bumper sticker at all. Indeed, coexistence is what the Islamists are at war with; or, if you prefer, pluralism, the idea that different groups can rub along together within the same general neighbourhood.

There are many trouble spots across the world but, as a general rule, even if one gives no more than a cursory glance at the foreign pages, it's easy to guess at least one of the sides: Muslims v Jews in Palestine, Muslims v Hindus in Kashmir, Muslims v Christians in Nigeria, Muslims v Buddhists in southern Thailand, Muslims v (your team here). Whatever one's views of the merits on a case by case basis, the ubiquitousness of one team is a fact.

This is why John McCain says radical Islam is the "transcendent challenge" of our times.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Omnia21 published on August 18, 2008 11:05 AM.

DELAHUNT INAUGURATES OUR "HALL OF SHAME" was the previous entry in this blog.

PELOSI INDUCTED INTO OUR "HALL OF SHAME" is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.